Choosing between a Mesh network and MikroTik CAPsMAN (Controlled Access Point system Manager) for enterprise environments depends on several factors, including the scale of the environment, network complexity, coverage and redundancy requirements, as well as management preferences. And maintenance.

Below are the advantages and situations where each option could be more convenient:

Rede's mesh

Mesh networks are designed to provide extensive WiFi coverage without the need for extensive cabling for each access point. They are especially useful in environments where it is difficult or impractical to install cables, and offer great flexibility and scalability.

Advantages of Mesh:

• Flexibility and Scalability: Easy to expand by simply adding more nodes to the network.
• Redundancy and Reliability: The network can self-heal and reconfigure if a node fails, finding the best path for data traffic.
• Simple Installation: Less wiring and complexity in physical installation.

Situations Suitable for Mesh:

• Old buildings or places where wiring is complicated or unfeasible.
• Areas that require rapid coverage and may expand in the future.
• Environments that change frequently, requiring network adaptability.

CAPsMAN by MikroTik

CAPsMAN allows you to centrally control multiple MikroTik access points (CAPs) within the network. It is ideal for environments that require centralized management, uniform configuration, and consistent policies across the WiFi network.

Advantages of CAPsMAN:

• Centralized Management: Configure and update multiple CAPs from a single control point.
• Configuration Consistency: Applies policies and configurations uniformly, ensuring consistency across the network.
• Enhanced Security: Facilitates the implementation of advanced security policies and centralized monitoring.

Suitable Situations for CAPsMAN:

• Enterprise environments with multiple access points that require uniform management.
• Places where structured cabling is viable to connect the CAPs.
• Networks that require specific configurations and strict security policies.

Conclusion

• For environments requiring flexibility, scalability and redundancy without extensive cabling infrastructure a mesh network it might be more convenient.
• En enterprise environments where centralized management, configuration consistency and security are crucial, and where a structured network infrastructure is viable, CAPSMAN would be the preferred option.

The final choice should be based on a careful evaluation of the specific needs of the business environment, including existing infrastructure considerations, operational and security requirements, as well as future expansion plans.